Land Management and Adoption of Biodiversity Conservation Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajec.v3i2.3138Keywords:
Land, Biodiversity, Conservation, Global Peri-Urban Agriculture, Sustainability, Opportunities, ChallengesAbstract
Generally, proposed areas for restoring the environment are growing in number, as are biodiversity conservation efforts in affluent nations. However, the fragmented ownership structure and management of lands, the multitude of landowners, and their diverse characteristics can present substantial obstacles to conservation endeavors. Consequently, attitudes toward conservation initiatives among landowners can vary widely, with some initiatives facing resistance while others garner consent and active participation. The study aims to systematize recent literature (2015–2024), gain knowledge of the context, and explore the social impacts of biodiversity conservation projects on land management. Globally, there is a scarcity of research aiming to establish overarching patterns. The PRISMA approach was used to conduct a rigorous publication evaluation for the current investigation. Finally, 25 identified articles were included in the study to systematize recent literature (2015–2024). To address this void, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the material of biodiversity conservation practices on private and public lands, aiming to construct a comprehensive framework of elements impacting the nod of approval of biodiversity conservation efforts on these lands. Our findings indicate that while conservation bodies, especially governmental bodies or non-governmental organizations (NGOs), have limited authority over individual landowners, they can enhance the adoption and perception of biodiversity conservation initiatives on land management by enhancing social communications. We developed four major recommended programs to assist in the development and implementation of biodiversity preservation programs for individuals and governments, as well as to identify actionable strategies for enhancing the social acceptance of such initiatives.
Downloads
References
Banerjee, O., Cicowiez, M., Vargas, R., Obst, C., Cala, J. R., Alvarez-Espinosa, A., Melo, S., Romero, G., Meneses, D. (2017). Gross domestic product alone provides misleading policy guidance for post-conflict land use trajectories in Colombia. Ecological Economics, 182, 106929.
Bontrager, A., Kretser, H., Leong, K., & Connelly, N. (2017). Conservation opportunity and risk mapping for carnivores using landowner survey data from the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. The Professional Geographer, 69(2), 225-238.
Busse, M., & Siebert, R. (2018). Acceptance studies in the field of land use—a critical and systematic review to advance the conceptualization of acceptance and acceptability. Land Use Policy, 76, 235-245.
Corbo-Perkins, G. (2018). Co-opting and resisting market-based instruments for private land conservation. Land Use Policy, 70, 172-181.
DeAngelo, M., & Nielsen-Pincus, M. (2017). Choosing the right policy tools to encourage watershed stewardship through the study of attitude. Society & Natural Resources, 30(11), 1328-1342.
Drescher, M., & Brenner, J. (2018). The practice and promise of private land conservation. Ecology and Society, 23(1).
Du, Y., Shui, W., Sun, X., Yang, H., & Zheng, J. (2019). Scenario simulation of ecosystem service trade-offs in bay cities: A case study in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 4293–4302.
Ejelöv, E., & Nilsson, A. (2020). Individual factors influencing acceptability for environmental policies: a review and research agenda. Sustainability, 12(1), 1-14.
Escobedo, F. J., Clerici, N., Staudhammer, C. L., & Corzo, G. T. (2015). Socio-ecological dynamics and inequality in Bogotá, Colombia’s public urban forests and their ecosystem services. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14, 1040–1053.
Farmer, J. R., Ma, Z., Drescher, M., Knackmuhs, E. G., & Dickinson, S. L. (2017). Private landowners, voluntary conservation programs, and implementation of conservation-friendly land management practices. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 58-66.
Gao, Q., Luo, H., Wang, Z., & Song, J. (2019). Research progress and prospect of Beautiful China. Progress in Geography, 38, 1021–1033.
Gao, X., Lin, Y., Xu, W., & Ouyang, Z. (2020). Research progress on the value realization of ecological products. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40, 24–33.
Greiner, R. (2015). Motivations and attitudes influence farmers’ willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts. Agricultural Systems, 137, 154-165.
Greiner, R. (2016). Factors influencing farmers’ participation in contractual biodiversity conservation: a choice experiment with northern Australian pastoralists. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 60(1), 1-21.
Ignatyeva, M., Vera, Y., & Alexey, D. (2022). Valuating natural resources and ecosystem services: Systematic review of methods in use. Sustainability, 14, 1901.
Jenkins, C. N., van Houtan, K. S., Pimm, S. L., & Sexton, J. O. (2015). US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 5081-5086.
Jokinen, M., Hujala, T., Paloniemi, R., & Vainio, A. (2018). Private landowners and protected species: what sort of noncompliance should we be worried about? Global Ecology and Conservation, 15, e00407.
Kovacs, E., Fabók, V., Kalóczkai, A., & Hansen, H. P. (2016). Towards understanding and resolving the conflict related to the eastern imperial eagle (Aquila heliaca) conservation with participatory management planning. Land Use Policy, 54, 158-168.
Kreye, M. M., Adams, D. C., & Ober, H. K. (2018). Protecting imperilled wildlife species on private lands: forest owner values and response to government interventions. Ecological Economics, 149, 254-264.
Kreye, M. M., Pienaar, E. F., Soto, J., & Adams, D. C. (2017). Creating voluntary payment programs: effective program design and rancher’s willingness to conserve Florida panther habitat. Land Economics, 93(4), 459-480.
Li, Y., Wen, R., & Chen, K. (2017). Review on the progress in marine ecosystem services valuation. Ecological Economics, 33, 120–126.
Li, Z., Shui, W., Wu, C., Sun, X., Feng, J., & Lin, Y. (2020). Evaluating the impacts of C9 leakage on bay ecosystem services: A case study in X bay. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 1735–1745.
Liao, M., Pan, J., & Sun, B. (2021). Analysis of the connotation and realization path of ecological products. Reform and Economic Systems, 1, 12–18.
Liu, J., & Mou, D. (2020). Research progress of ecological product value and its realization mechanism. Ecological Economics, 36, 207–212.
Liu, W., He, L., Xu, J., & Xu, D. (2023). Linking natural resource dependence to sustainable household wellbeing: A case study in Western China. Agriculture, 13, 1935.
Long, H., Kong, X., Hu, S., & Li, Y. (2021). Land use transitions under rapid urbanization: A perspective from developing China. Land, 10(935).
López, M., & Arbeláez, F. (2016). Nature conservation on private land: natural reserves of civil society in Valle del Cauca. Apuntes del Cenes, 35(2), 17-48.
Lute, M. L., Gillespie, C. R., Martin, D. R., & Fontaine, J. J. (2018). Landowner and practitioner perspectives on private land conservation programs. Society & Natural Resources, 31(2), 218-231.
MacDonald, D. W., & Feber, R. (Eds.). (2015). Wildlife conservation on farmland: Two volume set. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Molinos-Senante, M., Mocholí-Arce, M., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2016). Estimating the environmental and resource costs of leakage in water distribution systems: A shadow price approach. Science of the Total Environment, 568, 180–188.
Obst, C., & Eigenraam, M. (2017). Incorporating the environment in agricultural productivity: Applying advances in international environmental accounting. In C. Obst & M. Eigenraam (Eds.), New Directions in Productivity Measurement and Efficiency Analysis (pp. 151–172). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ouyang, Z., Lin, Y., & Song, C. (2020). Research on gross ecosystem product (GEP): A case study of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province. Environmental Sustainability and Development, 45, 80–85.
Rodewald, A. D., Martin, T. G., Wilson, K. A., Watts, M., Possingham, H. P., & Arcese, P. (2018). Tax shifting and incentives for biodiversity conservation on private lands. Conservation Letters, 11(1), e123.
Selinske, M. J., Coetzee, J., Purnell, K., & Knight, A. T. (2015). Understanding the motivations, satisfaction, and retention of landowners in private land conservation programs. Conservation Letters, 8(4), 282-289.
Selinske, M., Cooke, B., Torabi, N., Hardy, M., Knight, A., & Bekessy, S. (2017). Locating financial incentives among diverse motivations for long-term private land conservation. Ecology and Society, 22(2).
Shui, W., Chen, Y., Su, Z., & Fan, S. (2017). Agricultural ecosystem services function value evaluation under the influence of specialized tea planting: A case study in Anxi, Fujian Province. Ecological Economics, 37, 3311–3326.
Shui, W., Du, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, H., Fu, Y., Fang, B., & Huang, M. (2019). Spatio-temporal dynamics and scenarios simulation of trade-offs between ecosystem services in Min Delta urban agglomeration. Ecological Economics, 39, 5188–5197.
Sinthumule, N. I. (2017). Resistance against conservation at the South African section of greater Mapungubwe (trans)frontier. African Security Review, 52(1), 53-77.
Sliwinski, M., Burbach, M., Powell, L., & Schacht, W. (2018). Factors influencing ranchers’ intentions to manage for vegetation heterogeneity and promote cross-boundary management in the northern Great Plains. Ecology and Society, 23(4).
Smith, F., Smillie, K., Fitzsimons, J., Lindsay, B., Wells, G., Marles, V., Hutchinson, J., O’Hara, B., Perrigo, T., & Atkison, I. (2016). Reforms required to the Australian tax system to improve biodiversity conservation on private land. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 33(6), 443-450.
Suškevičs, M., Hahn, T., Rodela, R., Macura, B., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2018). Learning for social-ecological change: a qualitative review of outcomes across empirical literature in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(5), 1085-112.
Tao, J., Lu, Y., Ge, D., Dong, P., Gong, X., & Ma, X. (2022). The spatial pattern of agricultural ecosystem services from the production-living-ecology perspective: A case study of the Huaihai Economic Zone, China. Land Use Policy, 122, 106355.
Torabi, N., Mata, L., Gordon, A., Garrard, G., Wescott, W., Dettmann, P., & Bekessy, S. A. (2016). The money or the trees: what drives landholders’ participation in biodiverse carbon plantings? Global Ecology and Conservation, 7, 1-11.
Wang, J., Ma, G., Wang, Z., Wang, X., Yu, F., Liu, G., Zhao, Y., Yang, W., Shi, M. J., & Deng, J. S. (2021). Development and application of indicator system about the quaternary industry of ecological products in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 31, 1-8.
Wollstein, K., & Davis, E. J. (2017). A ‘hammer held over their heads’: voluntary conservation spurred by the prospect of regulatory enforcement in Oregon. Human-Wildlife Interactions, 11(3).
Wu, L., Gu, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). Spatial econometric modelling and the influencing factor effects of inbound tourism development in China’s provincial regions. Tourism Tribune, 35, 14-27.
Zamula, I., Tanasiieva, M., Travin, V., Nitsenko, V., Balezentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2020). Assessment of the profitability of environmental activities in forestry. Sustainability, 12, 2998.
Zhang, L., Chen, X., Liang, T., Wang, H., Hao, C., Ren, Y., Li, Y., & Wu, S. V. (2020). Research progress, problems and prospects of ecosystem products value accounting in China. Research of Environmental Sciences, 36, 743–756.
Zhang, X., & Yao, Z. (2020). The implementation mechanism of the value of ecological products of natural resources in a new era. Natural Resources Economics of China, 33, 62–69.
Zhang, X., Dong, W., & Qin, G. (2020). Morphological transformation and value realization of ecological capital and ecological products: Expansion analysis based on Marxist capital cycle theory. Ecological Economics, 10, 213-218+227.
Zhang, X., Dong, W., & Qin, G. (2020). Morphological transformation and value realization of ecological capital and ecological products: Expansion analysis based on Marxist capital cycle theory. Ecological Economics, 10, 213–218+227.
Zhou, J., Zhou, J., Wang, Q., Tang, J., & Lin, L. (2022). A review of ecological assets and ecological products supply: Implications for the karst rocky desertification control. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 10168.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kossivi Fabrice Dossa, Yann Emmanuel Miassi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
